Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JohnnyHerz 1255 days ago
Only read if you are like minded and crave an echo chamber.

The few salient points in this critique of Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter are completely lost in the overt biases of the author and publication.

Acting as if pre-Elon Twitter wasn't already doing "unconscionable" things to choke off free speech - while claiming Elon Twitter is Satan incarnate in that regard is laughably partisan.

The critique of Elon's public musings and actions based on a specific idealogy could just as easily be turned back on the author.

dreaming of unbiased journalism...

2 comments

This passage certainly does portray Musk as inherently apolitical or amoral, disregarding ideology-

> Twitter might have had a reputation as a left-leaning workforce, but there had always been a faction that disapproved of its progressive ideals. On Slack, some of these workers had formed a channel called #i-dissent, where they asked questions like why deadnaming a trans colleague was considered “bad.” When Musk announced he was buying the company, one of the more active i-­dissenters was thrilled. “Elon’s my new boss and I’m stoked!” he wrote on Linked­In. “I decided to send him a slack message. I figured you miss 100% of the shots you don’t make ”

> This employee was cut during the first round of layoffs. Soon, all the prominent members of the #i-dissent Slack channel would be gone. The channel itself was archived, while bigger social channels like #social-watercooler were abandoned.

LMAO negative 1 point for me. -methinks the author is sensitive to critique
make that negative 2 points for me and counting...

Seems there are a couple snowflakes floating around SMH