|
|
|
|
|
|
by samaraga
5274 days ago
|
|
|
As I couldn't find the date it was published, I deduced it must be written in 2001 from copyright at the bottom, as you pointed out.
Also observing the rule everyone does here at HN while referring to old articles, I added the year.
Even I have the same feeling about the modification of the article. |
|
|