|
I believe the general claim is that multiplication tables, and more specifically, the manner in which they are taught could disadvantage particular communities. Culturally, not every community handles rote memorization the same. There's been a desire to change the way multiplication is taught, and a strong pushback from a certain set that say, "Well, I learned multiplication tables, what's wrong with them?" Most (good) math curriculum in elementary age now teaches many different techniques for performing the same operation. Sums, for instance, are taught in the traditional way (add the ones column, then carryover to the tens column, etc.) but they are also taught in other ways, e.g. (borrow to get to the nearest tens, add the tens together, return what you borrowed). Kids then have a variety of approaches, must still show their work, but can use the technique that makes the most intuitive sense to them. Like many things that get demonized online, or reduce to the absurd, there's a really interesting and systemic change happening if you take the time to understand the reasoning. |
Can someone cite a source to such a claim?