Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stu432 1249 days ago
People died because of the last set of protests. That's not a reasonable consequence of a public protest.
1 comments

Do you have a source for that?
https://metro.co.uk/2022/10/21/just-stop-oil-accused-of-havi...

Ambulance took 40 minutes to attend traffic accident because roads were blocked. Accident also occurred on M20 where traffic was rerouted because other road was blocked.

Police took two or three days to remove them.

Perhaps I’m not understanding, but is it legal to be climbing and stay high up on the cables on a major roadway?

Well, I think that's the debate at the moment and I don't know the answer: Are the relevant laws already there? Are new laws needed? Is it an issue with the way the police responds, of fails to respond, to these actions?
It’s in everyone’s best interest to keep restrictions as narrow as possible. The problem isn’t the bridge, but other more acceptable venues that would also be restricted.

Allowing protests only in some alleyway where nobody is present; or if a government can simply and easily apply postponement/cancellation tactics: This would be a problem as well.

It's in everyone's best interest that roads, especially main ones, remain open

Specifically the current 'protests', be it blocking roads or criminal damage, do not serve any constructive purpose at all. They are carried out by the 'usual suspects'. They could organise a massive gathering in Hyde Park (and similar in towns throughout the country), for example, that would get huge media coverage as well without causing problems, ah but that wouldn't be 'direct revolutionary action'...

Thanks