|
|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
1245 days ago
|
|
|
> And even if everything is correct, it's has to parse a string at runtime. I consider that alone unaesthetic. Technically, it doesn’t have to do that. If a program includes the header declaring printf using the <> header defined in the standard and then calls printf the compiler is allowed to assume that the printf that the program will be linked to will behave according to the standard, and need not compile a call to printf. It can generate code that behaves identically. A simple example is gcc converting a printf with a constant string to a puts call (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25816659/can-printf-get-...) |
|
|