[xracy]

When 1% (~4M) of the country owns 32% of the wealth, you can either target them for taxes. OR you can go after the 160M people in the Middle/Upper 40% to get the 26% of the wealth... Last option, as a compromise you can go over the top 10% (40M) for 72% of the wealth.

Now, I'm a simple IRS person, but I want to maximize taxes garnered for time spent. This is such a stupidly easy equation.

Pretending that taxing the rich for all they've got is less effective than taxing the upper/middle class, is just absolute BS, and is easily proved false.

[monero-xmr]

The rich own assets, they aren’t making massive amounts of income. Wealth taxes don’t work well. The game at the highest level is very complex.

In Europe, the middle class pays far more in tax. The left in America advocate for a European-style welfare state but pretend the middle class doesn’t have to pay a nickel in extra tax for it because they can get it all from the rich. The math doesn’t add up.

[xracy]

"wealth taxes don't work" - citation needed

Also, I'm explicitly suggesting the top 10% of folks as a target for taxation.

[monero-xmr]

The only major country to attempt a wealth tax was France, which repealed it.

[xracy]

et voila "one wealth tax didn't work", becomes "all wealth taxes don't work". But also what does "didn't work" even mean here? There's nothing about the French law that suggests it didn't get money.

But also, this was like, a lot easier to verify you're wrong about this (quick Google Search reveals): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_tax#Current_examples

That reads as 9 countries that are doing it. So I'm going to need a lot more citations from you to believe anything you post from here on out.