[voltaireodactyl]

Forgive as I am not sure I completely follow your comment and overall implications. To clarify — your contention is that:

1) no source confirming the existence of such an organization exists but-

2) that this absence is due to an endemic and total failure on the part of the conservative media (Hannity, The Hill, Lincoln Project, etc) to properly investigate as-

3) the organizational structure DOES exist so apparently that its obviousness renders a source unnecessary.

Is that accurate? Because if so I have to say I remain unconvinced.

And while I certainly have many cherubic qualities, I think calling someone “cute” for asking the most basic questions in response to a claim of comprehensive organizational structure is, at best, misguided. At worst, one might consider it an attempt to gaslight and minimize realistic obstacles to winning over people to your POV.

Just a thought ;)