[adamrezich]

I don't care what WotC thinks, I don't care what Polygon writers think, and I don't care to argue about something as volatile yet useless as drawing comparisons between real-world races and fantasy races, because I also think that's all really, really stupid and tiring, and being offended on the behalf of others is not a very productive use of my time.

[mynameisvlad]

> Do you have anything to saw about the actual opinion?

So, no, you just have stuff to say about who is making the opinion and that it's "not a productive use of your time" to argue about it.

For something not being a productive use of your time, you sure are dedicating an awful lot of time being contrarian to it.

[adamrezich]

I wrote two short replies expressing my thoughts using entirely my own words. it probably took me less than four minutes to write both comments plus this one. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove, other than your frustration at my unwillingness to engage with these tired, played-out contemporary-politicization-of-fantasy talking points?

[mynameisvlad]

That for someone who doesn’t want to engage, you sure are engaging a lot.

Either you don’t care, in which case you wouldn’t bother to continuing to reply, or you do actually care but just don’t want to express what you know is an unpopular opinion, and are just side-stepping it with this whole “I’m better than this argument” attitude.

[adamrezich]

the "aha, I baited you into replying to my reply to your comment, see, you do care after all, if you really didn't care then you wouldn't reply" schtick is incredibly tired and played-out too, as well as insultingly petty and completely unbecoming.

if you were willing to rephrase whatever opinions you assimilated from plural Polygon articles into your own words and ask what I think about them, then I might have been slightly more likely to engage with them (your opinions). but merely repeatedly linking to something someone else wrote and saying "so what do you think about that, huh?" is not exactly interesting discourse. there is no "intellectual curiosity" (HN rules) happening here, just weak attempts at baiting the same old tired Internet arguments from the past decade, which many people, myself included, are long since exhausted with.

what do you expect to gain from this continued exchange?

(note that I'm posing a question to you, inviting you to reply to me, if you so choose, and, if you do, I won't mock or belittle you for replying, because this is a discussion website, and that would be silly.)

[mynameisvlad]

Once again, for someone who has said multiple times that they don't care to engage and are above all these "weak attempts at baiting", you sure are putting a lot of time continuing to engage.

It's very hard to pretend to not care when you write multiple impassioned paragraphs about what you consider interesting discourse and what is beneath you. Your continued insistence of this "I'm better than you and this argument" does nothing but show that you do, indeed continue to care.

So maybe put all of this time that is so beneath you to read the article, and then you can proceed to insult it rather than just insulting the lowly people beneath you and our petty arguments.

[adamrezich]

I care more about this website and the quality of discourse on it (since that's all there is to it) than I care about what Polygon opinion piece writers think about being offended on the behalf of others over fantasy writing—you seem to have these priorities reversed, hence your ongoing "aha, I baited you into replying to me" schtick, which is not interesting, curious, intellectually-stimulating discourse, and neither is "just read these articles I didn't write in order to learn what my opinion is so I can argue with you about that instead of mocking you for replying to me."

[pessimizer]

Why insert yourself into a conversation so beneath you, then, throwing insults?

[adamrezich]

whom did I insult?