[multiplegeorges]

It reduces women to instruments to serve men's happiness.

[tmn]

This is the logical fallacy prevalent in these types of 'this offends me' reactions. You have completely fabricated this takeaway.

[dgfitz]

A.) No it doesn't, not even a little bit. B.) He said he was happily married, he didn't say his happiness it tied to a woman, you're twisting words.

[slt2021]

replace woman with kids. Happy parents are happy parents, unhappy parent is a philosopher parent.

doesnt sound like any -ism to me

[Gud]

No it doesn’t.

[weakfish]

Great argument! Let me try.

Yes it does.

Did it do it right?

[Gud]

Parent didn’t provide an argument and the burden of proof is on them.

[concordDance]

You can and should do better than them, not descend to their level. It's obvious to any reader that the parent was just making a bold assertion.

[xigoi]

How do you prove that something is false if you weren't given a reason why it should be true in the first place?

[krageon]

By saying what you just said. It's already better than saying "No u".