|
|
|
|
|
by roetlich
1256 days ago
|
|
I think that part is still fine, because there he's only saying that he got different results for the same test on his hardware, which might help to set a baseline. Really weird is the table after "Let’s see the breakdown". It's not super clearly labeled so I'm not fully sure which data is which, but it looks he's comparing neo4j on his machine to memgraph on their older hardware, that would be very silly.
Looking at the source for the benchmark, that also seems to hold. |
|