|
|
|
|
|
by icu
1254 days ago
|
|
The question is, at what cost, and with what legitimacy? Too often despots and their cronies get countries into economic trouble, countries that have been taken advantaged by Western interests for hundreds of years. When the country collapses, the IMF and World Bank subjugate the country to Western interests further often to the destruction of the environment and detriment to upward mobility of the population. Using statistics like reduction of extreme poverty or wage growth when not taking into account other factors like inflation or mortality for example does not help when discussing the complex topic of the IMF and the World Bank and if these institutions are a net benefit to the impoverished. |
|
Agreed.
> When the country collapses, the IMF and World Bank subjugate the country to Western interests further often to the destruction of the environment and detriment to upward mobility of the population.
Can you give me any concrete examples of IMF reforms making a country worse off economically?
> Using statistics like reduction of extreme poverty or wage growth when not taking into account other factors like inflation or mortality for example
Okay, mortality in India has fallen steadily from 1% in 1991 to 0.7% in 2020. And inflation doesn’t have a clear pattern but it’s never returned to its 1991 peak of 13.5%.
I’m not just cherry-picking stats here! India has actually gotten way way better in the last few decades, and the rate of improvement rose dramatically after the 1991 reforms!