| My site, Correlated (http://www.correlated.org) has gotten >100K hits from StumbleUpon (all organic), and in my experience, it's crappy traffic. I've looked at my site stats, and only a tiny fraction of those hits -- less than 1 percent -- results in any sort of action on the site. Compared with traffic from practically every other referrer, that's markedly less engagement. There are some sites, for instances, whose referral traffic results in engagement in up to 50 percent of cases, and those aren't all necessarily highly targeted audiences. What can I infer from this? My guess is that a lot of this StumbleUpon traffic is coming from people who are only passively using the service, as opposed to actively using it. I would describe an active user of the service as someone who says, "Hey, I'm bored. I'll go to StumbleUpon and look for some interesting websites." I would describe a passive user of the service as someone who, say, has it set as their homepage, so it opens up whenever they open their browser, whether or not they're actually in the mood to check out new websites. Whatever the reason, StumbleUpon referrals are traffic that I have largely written off. |
So yeah, not exactly high quality traffic.