|
|
|
|
|
by jraph
1262 days ago
|
|
I was a bit tongue in cheek on this part of my comment, because that's the idea. You are essentially saying that respecting the license I chose is impractical. In other words, that my work cannot be used in such a setting. So, either AIs need to stop being trained so liberally, or it becomes clear that copyright does not apply when used as training set. I appreciate that other people have different opinion on this, but I pretty much don't want my work to be used like this, and having a variant of licenses to cover this would be concerning. The fight about this is not over, hence the hope I'm expressing. |
|