[AYBABTME]

If we go back to the fear of AIs supplanting humans, Accelerando style, and the desire to keep humans relevant. Then assume that we accept the premise that humans-augmented-by-AI work is an acceptable outcome for that future, in an attempt to keep humans relevant.

Then is it a problem if a human slightly modified an AI's work? Isn't that the desirable outcome? And if the work itself is so useless that it would be worthy of a zero grade, then perhaps another way of measuring usefulness should be used.

In a way, I feel like we can't impose old-world grading techniques to new-world content synthesis technologies.