Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lrvick 1263 days ago
Everyone opted into tracking, and we can opt out again too. I buy things with cash, and cash purchased prepaid debit gift cards. I do not own a cell phone.

Anyone who wants to track me will have to pay someone to actually follow me around which would cost more than anyone stands to make from the data they would obtain.

4 comments

> Everyone opted into tracking

No, everyone opted in to using services. Tracking was buried in legalese in an unenforceable unilateral "contract".

> and we can opt out again too

Too little, too late, and unenforceable. You might opt-out of the ways you know are being tracked but there's hundreds of ways that you can be tracked without even knowing about it.

> Anyone who wants to track me will have to pay someone to actually follow me around which would cost more than anyone stands to make from the data they would obtain.

I'm not sure you understand just how much profit there is in controlling entire populations by monitoring and predicting what they do.

I am well aware of the profit incentives for my data, and selling manipulation as a service. It is why I opt out in every instance I have a choice.

I use Whonix for most personal browsing, I use 0 GAFAM services or products by surveillance capitalism companies, I do not own a smartphone, I randomize my wifi MAC addresses, and the majority of my transactions are in cash or anonymized bitcoin.

License plate plate cameras, facial/gait recognition systems, and airline tickets are about the only automated ways left to track me that I am aware of.

Do you have the right in your jurisdiction to request the data that data brokers have collected on you? If yes, and you haven't already, you may be surprised to the extent they have been able to track you in spite of your counter-measures.

I used CCPA to get this data from brokers. I am far more careful than most in my attempts to keep from being tracked, but perhaps not as careful as you. The dossiers contained data that went back to when I was 7 years old. The most surprising item was data that could only have come from a print shop (from fake joke business cards printed there, but never handed out).

I am in California and am currently shopping for deep-dive CCPA enforcement services as that is a lot more work than not creating the data in the first place.

Friends have used https://privacyduck.com with success.

I've just been working my way through various lists. It frustrates me greatly that the public is expected to do go through this effort to "opt out" rather than the sleazy stalker companies being required to get opt in.

https://oag.ca.gov/data-brokers

https://web.archive.org/web/20201022024035/https://www.stopd...

list of credit reporting agencies to freeze reports with:

https://www.consumerlawfirm.com/credit-reporting-agencies.ht...

There are 100+ agencies you need to file with, and you need to follow up several times as your data can be re-syndicated between them during grace periods. It is -lot- of work which is why efficient services who've optimized this are likely worth the money.
Unless you live in a rural area, it's increasingly practical to track you and/or your vehicle by means of networked surveillance camera and automated analysis. It might even be that not having a device would make you stand out somewhat as potential malcontent. I don't disagree with your ethos or methods, but I'm not at all convinced of their sufficiency or scaleability, and think they place too much burden on individuals while settling for none at all upon those doing the surveillance.
Public transit, bikes, electric skateboards, and taxis allow you to move mostly invisibly in cities when required.

Also not having a cellular connection is not a burden once you learn how to navigate for yourself again, and know how to quickly find wifi when you need it. If anything it frees you from compulsive notification checking.

If people flag me as a potential malcontent and discriminate against me I am happy to turn it into an expensive media circus to raise more awareness. I am exercising my legal right to opt out of surveillance systems.

The more people that do this, the less we stand out and the more protected we all are. I do not even -need- to do any of this but I help provide cover for the people that rally do. People like me also make it harder for businesses to do away with cash, table pagers, paper menus, etc.

Except that the data they can review against everyone using prepaid cards can be consolidated into a database and reviewed. If 90% of these cards are used the same way, it's fair enough to assume you're using it in one of those ways. If they're wrong, meh, who cares?
I only use prepaid cards on rare occasion when I encounter a bar or a parking meter that does not take cash. Regardless my name is not associated with any of those transactions.

In general cash raises the least eyebrows and is reasonably anonymous.