Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vincnetas 1256 days ago
Ok i could be wrong. Was commenting after reading arbitration documents where respondent is referred as "The Respondent is Kevin Watson"

https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d200...

"The Respondent registered the domain name <gail.com> on April 4, 1996, named after his wife’s given name, as a birthday present for his wife. "

So yes, looks like was wrong. It's his wife's site (A gift)

1 comments

Yes, that's what the link that you're commenting on says. You didn't need to do any more research, especially not into arbitration documents.