[bamboozled]

You misunderstood my point...

Fire is warm and it produces light, and it's easily observable in nature, it's a "thing" which humans could easily describe and recognize, before reproducing it. Someone was rubbing two sticks together, and noticed things became warmer, and warmer as they went, starting to feel like the warmth of fire and it happened.

In the case of AGI, I don't feel like we have a definition of done, so it seems kind of crazy to be chasing it / throwing money at it.

I didn't say say I'm against it, but does seem like a crazy way to go about it. Keep producing models that one day might mimic intelligence as we know it?