|
|
|
|
|
by notahacker
1264 days ago
|
|
> If your account is zero, you're not paying any tax, and the account grows quicker. So the best strategy for any individual to maximise their accumulation in your currency (or in practice, minimise their losses) is to refuse to accept payments into their account, insisting on receiving payments in other currencies instead. As everyone is incentivised to refuse your currency and nobody is incentivised or required to accept it, your currency can't actually be spent. |
|
You want a currency that people want to both spend and earn. If you have a deflating currency then people would rather earn it than spend it, if you have an inflating currency then people would rather spend it than earn it.
You might now argue that the rate of inflation or deflation should be set by the market to find the optimal money tax that balances willingness to spend and receive money.
But here is the thing. If the rate of the national currency is suboptimal people will try to find substitutes. If the central bank tightens the money supply too much and unemployment is too high, then people will also accept this alternate currency because they are going to spend most of it anyway, they won't be paying much tax to begin with.
Also, from what I have seen the fees people are willing to pay on credit cards are quite ridiculous compared to the -5% demurrage of the chiemgauer. The Chiemgauer circulates 3.5 times faster than the euro so the effective fee is something like 1.25% which is less than credit card fees. Unless you are filthy rich and keep all your savings as liquid money instead of lending it out the fee is basically irrelevant.
Once you take into account that lending at 0% interest is possible then from a macroeconomic perspective the system is cheaper for the average participant and if we assume economical stability promises become true then even the wealthy with who insist on holding money will benefit because banks are less likely to need a bailout and there is no inflation.
So the problem isn't that people will refuse to accept it, the question is how do you get it started in the first place. How do you convince a critical mass of people to adopt it?