Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by EarlKing 1257 days ago
No, I'm quite clear about what standing means, thank you. They're predicating their standing on this being a violation of a nuisance statute. I didn't say they don't have standing under that statute, just that the statute is unconstitutionally vague.
1 comments

> just that the statute is unconstitutionally vague.

Half of your constitution is unconstitutionally vague