That's a reasonable complaint, but maybe it means we need better lightweight libraries with well thought out interfaces or better library management like deweller suggested in the comments on the original thread.
That would be good - but then you begin to talk about a unified logging interface and standardisation like folder structure, class loading, class interfaces and so on.
At which point it's basically a framework (perhaps without the routing/initialisation code).
One thing I would like to see (no idea if it exists) is a core package architecture (that did all of the above) and let you hang packages as and when you need them.
I've been keeping an eye out for such a thing for a while with no joy.
At which point it's basically a framework (perhaps without the routing/initialisation code).
One thing I would like to see (no idea if it exists) is a core package architecture (that did all of the above) and let you hang packages as and when you need them.
I've been keeping an eye out for such a thing for a while with no joy.