[yamasanama]

What advantage does this theory have over the more common (?) assumption that the amino acids came to existence on earth itself? Serious question, I'd like to know.

For example, this theory sti doesn't answer the question how they came into existence in the first place. It's certainly not obviously better than assuming they suddenly appeared on another planet and then transported to earth..

[nobody9999]

>For example, this theory sti doesn't answer the question how they came into existence in the first place. It's certainly not obviously better than assuming they suddenly appeared on another planet and then transported to earth..

Not sure what you're getting at WRT amino acids. Amino acids form due to the particular chemistry of carbon (what we call "organic chemistry"[1]), and they do so wherever both energy and the building blocks of amino acids exist. No planet required.

This was shown pretty well by the Miller-Urey experiments[2] as well as the discovery of amino acids in interstellar molecular clouds[0].

So...Amino acids can (and do) form wherever the raw materials and energy exist. That's the "how".

[0] https://physicsworld.com/a/amino-acid-detected-in-space/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_chemistry

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment

[mac01021]

So then they'd have formed on earth - no panspermia required?

[Hani1337]

planet is an amalgam of rocks and minerals, heat is provided by the sun, water could have been of extraterrestrial origin, and then enters fungi using heat and humidity to develop mycelium, mycelium turns minerals into compost with enzymes, space dust introduces bacteria which evolves through thermal vents a/biogenesis, and voila, you have life. We do know that before vegetation, Earth had fungi structures made of half rock, half fungi flesh, and they probably evolved into actual trees. At the same time, lichen spread from underwater to the surface of the Earth. Fungi released CO2, creating an atmosphere for plants to develop. The rest is evolution.

[dieselgate]

I'm not so sure it offers an "advantage" but it's rather just something we seem to have evidence for - indeed it does not answer any questions rather raising more possibly

[h_r]

One weak advantage is panspermia allows you to avoid the question.

[_Algernon_]

It doesn't though. It only requires for life to have evolved on another planet, reached space and then potentially traveled lightyears through space to reach earth.

Space is really fucking empty. Seems less likely than throwing a rock out of a rocket on the way to mars and hitting a random bucket, without looking. Add to that that it would require life having evolved while the universe was younger and different to the only state of the universe that we know to support life.

Is it impossible. No. But at that point the theory has as much explanatory power as creationism, i.e. none.

[dieselgate]

This made me laugh, yes I agree in a way. Maybe some day we will discover amino acid constituents on earth or another planet and it will fill in more of the blanks. It's the definition of chicken and egg though

[nobody9999]

Done. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment

You may not have heard about it, as the paper describing the experiment was only published 69 years ago.

[dieselgate]

Thanks for the link and for the reminder, did learn about this experiment actually in organic chemistry years ago. Suppose it's a bit nonsensical to look for amino acid "constituents" then. Not a fan of the snark though