|
|
|
|
|
by svnt
1254 days ago
|
|
This is not true. They have not evolved/derived as much for a number of reasons including differing mutation rates, minimal environment change, selection against adaptation, etc. It is not visible vs invisible changes that progress at some fixed proportion to reproductive rate; that is a gross oversimplification and conceptually inaccurate. See e.g. Sewell Wright’s fitness landscapes. |
|