| The whole article feels to me like it’s generated by GPT-3 based on a few prompts. There’s a reference to Forbes article not linked, but otherwise zero things backing up this 1% claim. The thing that makes this very suspicious is the continuous repetition of the same content, the anonymous writer and the fact that the only other article in this publication is about a tool that’s even better than GPT-3. GPT-3 certainly has the effect that I have a hard time trusting that anonymous articles that are repetitive are not AI generated any more… Update: I posted the exact same comment on the article and the author deleted it within two minutes. instead of responding. So yes, it’s likely I was on the money. I re-posted the comment. If it’s not there, you know that this comment is uncomfortable for the author for some reason. Update 2: my second comment was removed within minutes as well. There’s a commenter claiming they are the author saying they used ChatGPT to generate parts of the article. Does not explain why they keep deleting my comment and not disclosing that this article is AI-generated. Update 3: posted a third and final comment asking the author to not delete this comment and answer if the article was verenigde by ChatGPT. Comment also deleted within minutes. This all underscores how it’s becoming hard to trust anonymous authors even now, and how this will just get worse. If a GPT3 article can generate so much discussion on Hacker News, without most people realizing we are arguing about the output of an AI, GPT3 is ready to go mainstream. |