Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Negitivefrags 1256 days ago
I always hate this “If it doesn’t work we have much more serious problems” attitude.

If the world did go into a multi-decade recession, what “more serious” problems would you have then your investments doing poorly?

You might answer things like “ buying food due to shortages” or something, but surely whatever problem you name, being more rich is going to solve it?

Now you can invest on the thesis that this isn’t going to happen, but to argue that the whole concept of investment is useless if it does seems very suspect to me.

2 comments

Okay, let’s put it this way: There’s no strategy that avoids all risks. You have to balance risks and possible gains. You can balance the risk of investments in the stock market by allocating part of your money to other investments or stores of value that you believe will do better in the scenario where the markets go down long-term. In other words, diversify and allocate according to your risk aversion. This being said, a world index provides a maximum of diversification in the equity market.
Different scale of seriousness. If the whole world goes into a recession there is a big difference between food shortages that you can buy your way out of with cash and food shortages that come as a result of societal collapse and money being worthless.

Being rich only matters as long as your investments/assets hold any value. If truly serious problems around your investments go to 0, your assets are only worth something as long as you can maintain control of them (police won't be around, nor will judges be) and even then your car will be worthless without gas.

It all depends on what meaning a person assigns to "serious" in this context. Personally as long as being rich solves my Problems I wouldn't describe any situation as serious.

> Being rich only matters as long as your investments/assets hold any value.

Also, as long as poorer people are not after you and your properties (and your life, even) through a revolution, which revolution could be caused by world-wide economical and societal crisis (if not a revolution then maybe a civil-war where the rich are of the wrong ethnicity etc)