[getToTheChopin]

Fair point. To add some context though, this data is based on the returns of the S&P500 index.

Companies in the S&P500 index are based in the U.S., but most of them earn revenues internationally as well.

"Roughly 40% of S&P 500 revenues are generated outside of the U.S., and about 58% of Information Technology company sales were sourced from abroad."

Source: https://www.globalxetfs.com/sector-views-sp-500-sensitivity-...

So, the performance of the U.S. stock market in the next 150 years will not rely solely on U.S. specific economic growth.

[MuffinFlavored]

I've always wondered, why do American investors get to benefit from companies like Apple? Why does Apple choose to be a U.S. company? We're obviously in competition with other countries globally in terms of getting companies like Apple to give us their tax dollars.

I know Apple does this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement#:~:te....

I just wonder, can they really not find a more favorable country to route the gross of their revenue through?

[JackFr]

The maturity and stability of the US stock market (by which I mean institutional and structural stability rather than price stability) make it the most frictionless, transparent and predictable place to raise equity capital. Add that dollars are also attached to a broad domestic market and the US corporate form is strongly entrenched in a culture of rule-of-law and there's a compelling case to create and maintain your company in the US.

[MuffinFlavored]

> The maturity and stability of the US stock market (by which I mean institutional and structural stability rather than price stability) make it the most frictionless, transparent and predictable place to raise equity capital.

The number one way that Apple benefits from this is giving shares to employees as compensation, right?

They aren't commonly "financing" projects with stock as far as I understand it. aka, they aren't diluting existing shareholders by issuing fresh shares to take advantage of the share price.

Since they aren't doing that, how do they benefit financially from their share price?

[tylerhou]

When Apple compensates employees with shares they issue them out of thin air IIRC. These are dilutive and are listed on their quarterly financial statements. So yes, they are financing projects with stock.

[saltcured]

They benefit from the stable marketplace every time a bit of ownership is exchanged from one party to another via stock transactions.

Compare this to some partnership or other private structure where owners may be unable to exit unless they can force the company to liquidate some assets to buy them out. Companies and investors who work that way can face liquidity hazards compared to a similar-sized stock corporation.

[im3w1l]

I think that it's because America is such an important market. Compared to Europe, Americans are richer and they all speak the same language. Many European companies struggle to expand from their home country to other EU countries.

[snowwrestler]

Do you think that people outside the U.S. cannot invest in Apple stock?

[MuffinFlavored]

No, I'm saying why does Apple choose to be "home" in America.

[jpadkins]

It's where they were founded / started up. And the cost / benefit of leaving US jurisdiction has never been high enough for them to relocate.

There are a lot of benefits of being incorporated in USA / Delaware.

[snowwrestler]

Ah, it's a good question. Apple was founded in the U.S. obviously, but U.S. companies can and sometimes do move their headquarters to another country. Burger King did it in 2014, reincorporating in Canada for primarily tax reasons. You can look up "corporate inversions" to see some other examples.

But the advantages have be very large for this to be worth it. The U.S. is a great place to do business in many ways. And as you noted above, U.S. companies can still get a lot of "foreign" tax benefits by shifting assets around between foreign subsidiaries (Apple's Irish trick for instance).

There are also emotional complications. A company like Apple is not just headquartered in the U.S., it is tightly coupled with the U.S. cultural identity. Moving out of the U.S. would break some of those ties, with resulting harsh consequences for Apple in politics, culture, retail sales, maybe even employees. You can look up what happened after Burger King moved... people were pissed.

So the short answer is, they started in the U.S. and staying here has a lot of benefits, while moving would come with high costs and somewhat unpredictable risks.

[MuffinFlavored]

> Apple was founded in the U.S. obviously, but U.S. companies can and sometimes do move their headquarters to another country.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/0000320193180...

Apple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China

Apple Distribution International Ireland

Apple Europe Limited United Kingdom

Apple Japan, Inc. Japan

Apple Operations Ireland

Apple Operations Europe Ireland

Apple Operations International Ireland

Apple Sales International Ireland

Braeburn Capital, Inc. Nevada, U.S.

It gets confusing to me as somebody "not in the know" on domestic/international business law/practices.

https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013...

> According to a report by a Congressional panel, Apple has avoided billions in taxes through the use of international subsidiaries.

> Apple has subsidiaries in Ireland where the company has negotiated a special tax rate of 2 percent. These units contract with manufacturers to assemble Apple products, sell the products to other subsidiaries for distribution, and return the profits up the chain of companies in the form of dividends. But some of these subsidiaries do not have a stated tax residence and pay no taxes at all.

This is from 2013 so I'm sure it's out of date-ish.

> These 3 subsidiaries are incorporated in Ireland, but have no country of tax residence

Looks like what I'm looking for is "country of incorporation and tax residence"

Seems like companies can choose to "file/create" their corporation in any country, then have miniature "subsidiaries" (is this the right word) in various other little countries.

[WoodenChair]

1. Rule of law

2. Mature financial system

3. Investment dollars

4. Talent/where talent wants to move to

5. Aligned values with California home base

6. USA represents their largest market for their products

7. The cost of moving

8. Cultural connection to where a company started

9. Existing investment in headquarters/infrastructure around the country

10. Political clout that being a US company provides

11. Network economics of being near other big tech in Silicon Valley/Austin/New York campuses

[refurb]

A great example of this is Singapore. I’ve worked with a few companies in Asia and it’s amazing what: a) rule of law, b) stable political environment, c) free capital flows can do in terms of attracting capital.

Singapore is pretty much the only option in SE Asia and the money keeps flowing in.

[xapata]

What alternative would you suggest?

[froglets]

Didn’t Apple already move to Ireland for the tax breaks?