|
I am a bit of a BSD outsider, but I've been exploring them recently. I'd say it's more like: • NetBSD – the oldest, aims at the widest platform support • FreeBSD – next oldest, aims at modern hardware, best hardware and desktop support, native ZFS. • OpenBSD – a bit younger, aims at correctness and security, so very basic hardware support, e.g. no Bluetooth at all. But that means it supports some of the newest kit, e.g. Apple M1 and M2, because its idea of "support" is so rudimentary. • Dragonfly BSD – the youngest, the most experimental. X86-64 only. Aims at supporting lots of CPUs, lots of memory, lots of disk via a homegrown fancy modern FS, HAMMER2. So, no, I suspect DragonFly is the fastest. |