|
|
|
|
|
|
by hutzlibu
1264 days ago
|
|
|
"It’s not for the wealthy, it’s for the working class." I think the swiss working class is a bit better of, than those in the subsahara facing drought. They are in the need of transition funds. I also think it would not be helpful to ban helicopter snow transport or something populistic, but it is really not smart, trying to keep things artificial alife - like certain wintersport areas - by means that contribute to the problem. |
|
|
With such an argument we could drop everything we're doing in Switzerland, as we're probably better off than most other people in this world (by average).
Don't make the mistake to think that every Swiss citizen is well off. Very well off compared to the rest of the world, sure. But we have our own class of people who barely get through the month. (These people would be homeless and absolutely devastated in the US, so we have that going for us.)
The only income smaller ski regions have are winter sports. If this goes away, these regions will probably have some very difficult times. Now, I'm talking about the smaller ski regions with not that much wealth. Different story compared to Zermatt, St. Moritz etc.
> it is really not smart, trying to keep things artificial alife
I do agree with your main point! I also smh when I see all of the artificial snow machines which waste lots of water and energy, the tons of cars which travel to these regions, mass tourism etc.
Which doesn't mean that we can't also say, that the working class in these regions will be in serious trouble if we stop.
Which doesn't mean that we shouldn't stop. Complicated, I guess :)