Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by anigbrowl 1260 days ago
My point isn't a dig at their quality (which is excellent) but at their lack of technological innovation for the last ~20 years. Their products are very good, they're just extremely risk averse and resting on a reputation they earned in the 1980s.
1 comments

Ok, but why do they need to be exciting and innovative? I would almost rather they didn't, lest the company pivot into something of the sort and eventually abandon their existing product line.

Besides, a lot of "innovation" in the music space seems to be about how many different ways we can bolt on cloud functionality

Roland says that they're exciting and innovate in their marketing materials, but most of their potential buyers don't find them to be so in recent years.

This PR exercise is not about how Roland is sticking to its proud tradition of timeless, handmade craftsmanship, but about how they are so cool and pushing the technological envelope. The market reaction might be summed up as 'amused skepticism' eg https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2023/01/06/roland-creates...