[neycoda]

> So, if your employee receives training that includes your trade secrets, those trade secrets will be implicitly used at the next job.

That's not a compelling argument for NCCs. It's an argument stifling competition, which should not be what NCCs are used for.

Every company takes a risk hiring someone that may leave with field expertise specifics to the company. Them using that expertise elsewhere makes the market healthier and more robust because it increases competition.

It's conceivable that NCCs are more anti-competitive than protective of the company's trade secrets, at least that's how it appears they're being effectively used nowadays.