|
|
|
|
|
|
by Supermancho
1265 days ago
|
|
|
This seems like a long-winded couching of the simple premise that would explain what happened. The tweet/author is misrepresenting the situation or was promised something he isn't legally entitled to, regardless. > mandate that the employee is given a 30 day notice that they will be laid off ie maybe he was terminated with notice and it wasn't explicitly labeled a severance letter. |
|
|