|
|
|
|
|
by MBCook
1257 days ago
|
|
Some levels of non-compete would be legal according to most people. If you work as a chef at my Mexican restaurant, it seems fair to bar you from opening another Mexican restaurant within say 1 mile. For a year. Simple, small, limited conditions to stop certain behaviors. As to why many industry/business non-competes are legal? There’s a good chance they may not be. But until taken to court we don’t really know. I’d be curious to know why these companies were chosen. Were they especially bad? Or just the companies they had the best evidence against? |
|
I would argue that's not fair at all. Think about what you're saying: you're saying that your Mexican restaurant should effectively not have to worry about your competition providing a better job to your staff than what you offer. That changes the dynamic so that you don't have to worry about doing your best to retain your staff.
This problem is the crux of why Silicon Valley is so successful (where you can't do this there) and tech hubs in other locations aren't anywhere close to as successful (where you can do this there).