[cma]

That still is anticompetitive.

[mcronce]

I think that's why the "bare minimum" language was used: It's a lot better than the status quo, but doesn't go far enough.

[h0l0cube]

The competition could still poach the employee for more money, if they deemed them worth it. Which is plain old competition.

[TulliusCicero]

Well, maybe, but in practice companies would only rarely use it, since they wouldn't want to pay for someone to not do work.

[exabrial]

Meh I dunno, I'd take it