|
|
|
|
|
by 0x457
1263 days ago
|
|
Dragonfly BSD is very good at being bad at taking constructive feedback /s It was born out of disagreement about how SMP should work in FreeBSD around Northwood P4 era (first HyperThreaded consumer CPU). Around that time, every general purpose OS as absolutely horrible at utilizing more than one logical cores. FreeBSD first gained SMP support at 5.0, and it was actually usable at 5.2. DragonFly BSD author had a disagreement how to implement it and though 5.x direction is bad, so, IIRC, he forked 4.x line and implemented his own vision from there.
Then it was "FreeBSD does it, so I'm going to do it differently", at least that's how it looks from an outside perspective. So, it's good at SMP if we're going by that outdated classification of BSD systems. |
|
Some would argue that in hindsight, Matt was correct at the time for the fork - from a technical standpoint.