[Spivak]

Literally nothing could be considered a handout to your own employee. By definition they’re selling their labor to you for a public contract called “legally being an employee” which comes with obligations on the part of the employee and employer.

Everything else is haggling over the specific details. If we decide that one of those employer obligations is to provide guaranteed runaway for employees in the case of termination then that’s that. If we decide that one of the employee’s obligations is providing 3 months of notice then that’s also that. But the two things aren’t at all related except in your mind.

Right now today with no change in policy whatsoever you have to make the choice as to weather you are willing and able meet your obligations as an employer before taking on employees and you have as much say and the same votes as everyone else to decide what those obligations are.

Fairness informs but does not ultimately decide the employer employee relationship. The only thing we get for sure if the system works is that over time it tends toward what is considered fair by the current working citizens.

[Eumenes]

Yeah but majority of employment contracts are 'at-will', so either party can say bye-bye anytime they want. I work, you pay me - pretty simple, lets keep it that way. If job seekers want extra perks/fringe benefits, ask for them in the job offer process. If employers want to offer them, be my guest. But keep the government out of this. We need less bureaucratic BS, not more.