|
|
|
|
|
by mattrobenolt
1269 days ago
|
|
Check your bias. This was clearly communicated as an experiment with surprising results. In some contexts, we don't have a choice but to support HTTP. So simply wanted to see how it stood up to a traditional mysql client. But you do you. |
|
To me, HTTP sits in a similar boat as JSON. Is it perfect? Is it good? Not necessary. But it's extremely extremely scrutinized and optimized due to its ubiquity in ways that other protocols and formats haven't been.
This was the entire point of this experiment and it's proved successful. The bias I wanted to challenge is exactly what you mentioned. Turns out, using HTTP as a transport and protobuf for encoding (which is basically gRPC) is comparable.