| I subscribed to Nature for a couple of years and although I am not a proper academic and maybe not the best judge, the articles in Nature sometime looks like they belong on vox.com or wired and not in a scientific paper. As in opinions presented as evidence, from an almost random person, without actually providing any. Especially around social subjects like the BLM protests. One thing I loved about 60 minutes back in the day, was their ability to present a story from multiple points of views. When I started reading Nature at my former employers, many many years ago, I felt their articles were like that. At some point it started to look like cherrypicking a single viewpoint, often with obvious political taint. Maybe it was always like that and I just used to idolize it. I still very much love the magazine though but stopped subscribing. Its really expensive. When I get my hands on a copy these days I just filter what I perceive as woke crap from the rest and skip those articles. I wonder if that is such a good thing…
Edit: typo and context |