Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kakali 1264 days ago
That’s fine, but it’s okay to call out the author’s bias. They contributed wonderful tests of the limitations of the headset. But the headset is only a failure for the authors use case. (AR)
2 comments
charcircuit 1264 days ago
I agree. If you know the author the bias is clear, but it's okay to point it out for people who are not familiar with him.
link
andybak 1264 days ago
Having used Hololens vs several passthrough-AR devices (Quest 2 etc) I'd take "poor image quality" over "limited FOV and the need to use it in a darkened room" any day.

Until AR display tech gets significantly better I think AR based on passthrough cameras is the only sensible approach.

link