|
|
|
|
|
by palant
1262 days ago
|
|
Disclaimer: I am the author of this article. I think that this issue is really universal across all banks in Korea. I was told (but couldn’t confirm) that this is a liability question. Supposedly, there was a court ruling that held a bank liable for a customer’s losses due to lack of security precautions. So now all of them implement “security precautions” to avoid liability. Thank you for the hint, I fixed the typo. Not being a native speaker, I had to ask a search engine what I did wrong in this sentence. :-) |
|
You already wrote as much in the article, but (AFAIK) the reality is even worse: there were court rulings that exonerated banks, as long as they followed the standard "security practices." Some hacker from China could access the bank's website from a suspicious IP, drain all the money from a poor guy's account, but the bank has zero obligation to do anything as long as it mandated that all users install half a dozen security plugins all the time.