[AussieWog93]

Back when I was a software engineer, I used to constantly hear how bad cplusplus was. Yet, in spite of this, I'd fairly often find myself using it because the results were just so much easier to parse.

Just as an example, cppreference doesn't have a page dedicated to std::string (when you search for it on Google, it tkes you to std::basic_string) whereas cplusplus does.

Even comparing the two pages, cplusplus immediately gets to the point that std::string is just a std::basic_string<char>, whereas cppreference has three paragraphs of technical minutiae before it finally points out what std::string is.

Even though cplusplus is out of date and incomplete, it's still often more useful than cppreference when you're trying to get your head around STL for the first time.