[scrose]

I’ve had ChatGPT tell me how to do something one way, and then give an example that omitted the specific syntax it had called out. It was only until I told it that the example didn’t reflect what it wrote that it basically said ‘oops! Here’s the corrected version’. I can’t even begin to imagine how poorly that could go in a legal context.

[tluyben2]

With chatgpt, with the little toy project I am trying that uses it, I default prompt it (automatically) that is is wrong and please provide a better version. I will generate a few versions that get better. Mind you that I don’t tell it what was wrong saying ‘this does not include all the points I asked’. It will say ‘oops, here is a version that includes all you asked’. And that a 3-4 times in a row.