|
|
|
|
|
by forgetfulness
1260 days ago
|
|
It's not the explanation of a political scientist whose column you'd prize reading, but it's better than most online commentary that humans would produce; for instance, it just takes for granted that he was being asked to step down and refused, and skipped over his unconstitutional attempt to dissolve Congress, but it makes an attempt to present facts. So, it's at the level of a person of average intelligence and a bit over superficial investment in what's being asked about. I lack the knowledge now to tell if it will stall at this level, but that's nothing to sneeze at for something whose labor comes for free and tirelessly, and may keep improving. |
|