Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sdenton4 1261 days ago
The fun part here is that most humans in the legal profession carry pretty extreme biases, judges included... The hope for legal ai is that you could progressively improve the biases, instead of waiting for N years for a bad judge to retire same maaaaybe get replaced by someone better.
1 comments

who though, who has access to the resources to push the boundaries of next-gen AI except the rich who already have their own biases? The AI that the public will get will be just as useful as the tech that public get now: limited, isolating, and designed to restrict their freedoms I exchange for easy entertainment
I'm confident that these things will get easier. It is approximately ten thousand times easier to train a decent classifier in 2023 than it was in 2013... We're also now living in a world with foundation models and fine tuning, which makes it /very/ possible to improve and specialize publicly released models. We see a lot of that with stable diffusion already.