I got the same feeling asking ChatGPT about some basic logic and maths concepts. IMO GPT can find the relevant training data to regurgitate, but i don't think it connects concepts.
I mean, it's a bullshit generator. It'll grab whatever it find in training set that kinda fits the topic and make sure it hits the word count - like a lazy student before deadline.
And that's also the result - sometimes it hits something good. Sometimes it spews up utter crock and it doesn't have any notion or understanding of the difference.
However, it does look good to the lazy and uninformed and it'll soon render judgemenets about your livelihood in the future. The same type of people who thought putting an AI in control of Teslas and copyright enforcement on YouTube will put this thing in control of your health and punishment very soon as well.
Erm. Yeah. Which is precisely what many lawyers and judges do, too, unfortunately. It often has little to do with logic and a lot to do with thinking in boxes and using words as nothing but triggers for other words. Some lawyers are far above that, of course. But what percentage of them works just like your “lazy student”? 80 percent?
Maybe then we’ll actually have some kind of quality to treatment. I’ve seen numerous doctors over the years for chronic health conditions and vast majority of them don’t really listen and can’t keep your whole history in their head while also trying to hear the new stuff. They are over worked with far too many patients.
And that's also the result - sometimes it hits something good. Sometimes it spews up utter crock and it doesn't have any notion or understanding of the difference.
However, it does look good to the lazy and uninformed and it'll soon render judgemenets about your livelihood in the future. The same type of people who thought putting an AI in control of Teslas and copyright enforcement on YouTube will put this thing in control of your health and punishment very soon as well.