[dathinab]

while I agree part of the decision was based on that in that specific cases the "reduced" salary was still more then most people do earn and it was overturned in apeals curt.

So this isn't applicable to most people.

still any form of unilateral contract change being legal is just absurd IMHO, and saying that because person didn't stop working completely it's like accepting the change is pretty absurd too. I mean if that wasn't a valid change wouldn't that mean that the person is still employed under the old contact and in turn had to come to work?