|
|
|
|
|
by Filligree
1268 days ago
|
|
Because the calling function isn't using it at the time. Rust isn't proving something about the number of references in memory; it's proving something about the dynamic behaviour of the program, i.e. that there can be at most one reference actively being used to mutate it, at a time. Hence there's no problem cloning a mutable reference implicitly, when calling a function. Notice that you can't for instance send it to another thread, however. |
|