[natrius]

Houston is the only major Texas city without zoning, and Houston still has plenty of parking requirements. As a result, both housing for people and housing for cars is really cheap. At this rate, Houston is going to figure out how to fix its planning mistakes of the past much faster than more regulated cities are going to decide to build enough housing for the people who want to live there. I'd never bet against Houston, or Texas in general.

How about we ease up on both zoning restrictions and parking requirements?

[s5300]

I’d bet against Texas in the idea that their working class/average citizen population is going to be quite oppressed until women have meaningful rights there.

Hard to have a functioning society when a near literal half of your population is seen at best as second class citizens.

[bmitc]

Houston had a female mayor, who happened to also be lesbian, for the maximum amount of terms. I get your general point about Texas, but at least Houston is probably the most diverse, multicultural, and liberal of the big Texas cities.

[Cyberdog]

This is a discussion about zoning and property values.

[s5300]

The parent I’m replying to is partially discussing betting against Texas, especially regarding property values - if you think half the populace within a state being viewed as second class citizens doesn’t affect property values, I think you should reconsider.

How many rich tech people from SV/Cali who paid top dollar for Texas property are now quickly fleeing after the recent political happenings that stripped the rights of half the voting population? I’ve seen quite a few personal anecdotes on HN & also a general trendline across publicly accessible real estate data that point to them ditching their Texas properties quite quickly. This most definitely affects property values, & at least touches on zoning issues in the grand scheme of things.

[prottog]

> How many rich tech people from SV/Cali who paid top dollar for Texas property are now quickly fleeing after the recent political happenings that stripped the rights of half the voting population?

Not very many at all, in my estimation. Those "rich tech people from SV/Cali" moved to Texas in the first place for their bottom lines, not because they thought Texas was the vanguard of progressive politics. I doubt a socially conservative state becoming more socially conservative is going to trigger many reverse moves.

If I had to guess, the extremely restrictive abortion laws (prohibited after six weeks of gestation with very few exceptions) that you're obliquely referring to are not going to stand for very long, either.

[dragonwriter]

> How many rich tech people from SV/Cali who paid top dollar for Texas property are now quickly fleeing after the recent political happenings that stripped the rights of half the voting population?

The rich tech people who moved from California to Texas often were doing it specfically because of support for the political party that did that stripping (sometimes centered on tax/regulatory policy rather than culture war issues, but still supporting the party knowing the culture war stance was part of the package.)

So, probably not many.