[ashwinne]

I was surprised by this inaccuracy too. But was impressed when I learnt that there is no analog wristwatch that can match this accuracy - they are all far far worse. (Isn't it shocking that all those super-expensive Rolexes and whatnot are all going off by minutes per month!) Get one of the Casio watches that syncs to atomic clock radio signals every night - it will be second-accurate all the time.

[Maursault]

> But was impressed when I learnt that there is no analog wristwatch that can match this accuracy

Seiko 5 automatics apparently[1] can.[2]

[1] https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/seiko-5-is-pretty-accurat...

[2] https://qr.ae/prvf6L

[klodolph]

According to the linked thread, the Seiko 5 is an order of magnitude worse… 5 seconds per day, versus 15 seconds per month for a quartz watch.

[Maursault]

This one?

     After observing Seiko 5 SNK809 for 35 days, I can say I´m happy with accuracy.

     Overall, it has lost 25 seconds during this time.
     It lost most of it when it was sitting on table 2 times during observation. When kept on wrist, it hardly lost any...