Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mattmerc 1264 days ago
I definitely have no idea what "free market banking" is. Though, I think your statement is contradictory. Central banks control their money supply, and thus they are in direct control of the S in S&D. So I am not sure what it means to say that they don't think interest rates are subject to S&D.

I am quite certain they have an accurate high level understanding of the relationship between their supply, interest rates and inflation.

I would also like to point out that there are different types of interest rates. I am not sure what rates you suggest would be set by S&D.

4 comments

>I definitely have no idea what "free market banking" is. Though, I think your statement is contradictory. Central banks control their money supply, and thus they are in direct control of the S in S&D.

Free market banking is banking in which any bank can issue money. The "supply" they were referring to is supply in the economic sense of supply and demand, i.e. the equilibrium market price of money/debt that would arise from the supply and demand of market participants.

If one farm had a legal monopoly on selling apples, them yes technically they are "supplying" them, but the price is not what the natural price of apples would be in a competitive market absent any legislatively granted monopolies.

In the modern system S&D is controlled by commercial banks and regulated by the central bank via the central bank rate.

Any bank could go rogue and lend money below central bank/base rate, but because all other banks can "earn" free money at the central bank at base rate this opportunity would instantly be arbitraged away.

Likewise market forces for borrowing are determined by the risk premium on top of base rate, with competition for borrowers arbitraging away opportunities for risk takers (lenders).

> I definitely have no idea what "free market banking" is.

This should help as an introduction:

https://thismatter.com/money/banking/history/free-banking-na...