[starkd]

The complaint is that it is a little too "on point" to be a serious discussion that weighs multiple angles. These are journalists determined to convey a particular point. It does not mean they are wrong. It just means it is not credible journalism.

[Cort3z]

Why is it not credible? They display only facts and link to sources for “conclusions”. What other angle is there to weigh?

[willnonya]

Did they display only facts that correlate to the desired conclusion or did they examine the I consistencies and counter points as well?

I don't disagree with their conclusion but the other commenter's point is reasonable. We live in a world where facts are fungible based on how they're presented and interpreted.

Few things are cut and dry despite how they are often presented.