|
|
|
|
|
|
by outcoldman
1269 days ago
|
|
|
That article also points to the paper https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/to-blob..., the images produced by stable diffusion are about 500-600Kb in size. At this point it could be a similar performance or could be a little better or a little worse. I am not saying that it is better to store files in SQLite, just saying that nothing wrong with it, if those files are below 1Mb. |
|
|
There is one very obvious thing wrong with it, the fact that those resulting images aren't files that are easily accessible to other things.
Unless storing in SQLite actually offers a real advantage in some other way, it's a disadvantage when the output is something you'll want to use with other tools.